News

The Queen’s Eye-Roll Over Kate’s Video and the Tough Love She’d Offer Harry”

Two years later, the tiny details of that poignant day remain vivid. Princess Charlotte wore a horseshoe brooch on her lapel, a cherished gift from her grandmother. The Queen’s coffin was adorned with sprigs of myrtle, sourced from the same plant that graced her wedding bouquet in 1947.

 

The hypnotic sway of the sailors’ white caps during the procession contrasted with the rhythmic sound of boots and hooves—like a collective heartbeat. Above, the sky was empty, while Emma, the patient pony, donned one of the Queen’s Hermes scarves, quietly witnessing her owner’s final journey to Windsor Castle.

 

Distractions emerged amidst the solemnity: Harry’s absence of a uniform despite his active service, and Meghan’s tears, discreetly wiped away by a black glove. Her choice of a black Stella McCartney cape dress added to the day’s somber elegance.

 

Princess Charlotte at Queen Elizabeth’s funeral in September 2022

 

And, of course, Kate, who was dressed immaculately in a razor-sharp Alexander McQueen coat dress, looking solemn yet striking in a Philip Treacy hat and veil and ropes of creamy pearls. Appearing to pretend Meghan did not even exist, she kept a watchful eye on her children and Prince William. Kate knew the day was not about her.

 

Ultimately, the occasion wasn’t about a tragedy, a life taken too soon. There was none of the visceral sobbing that wracked Princess Diana’s procession in 1997. It was more of a celebration, a pause before something new. It was an acknowledgement of everything the Queen stood for, a chance to show the world that, in the words of Carly Simon, nobody does it better.

 

The queue for the Queen’s lying in state had, for me, been a revelation. No pushing, no jostling – well, apart from the odd TV presenter. The long line of mourners had been a slow-moving symbol of what it means to be British. The mood was far from maudlin: it was jolly. In my group, people would volunteer to fetch supplies: ‘Oh look, an M&S! What does everyone want? Wine?’ Inside the hall, tears flowed, everyone bowed their heads before emerging shaken, moved. It was the sense of an ending, but also a warm feeling of optimism about what was to come.

 

Queen Elizabeth at the state opening of Parliament

 

That first year, the transition seemed positive and smooth. Charles’s coronation in May last year took place with barely a hitch. He and Camilla, now Queen, have been warmly received on walkabouts.

 

And then… the Dutch version of a book by Omid Scobie named two so-called ‘royal racists’. The Princess of Wales was forced to apologise for confusion over edits to a ‘manipulated’ Mother’s Day picture. And, of course, Charles and Kate announced their cancer diagnoses within months of one another. Suddenly, the Royal Family seemed depleted, rudderless. Wild speculation about Catherine’s absence from public life earlier this year, before she revealed she had cancer, swirled online, and the Queen’s mantra of ‘never complain, never explain’ seemed as outdated and restricting as a corset.

 

The Queen would be heartbroken that, having waited so long to wear the Crown, Charles has been rendered so frail so swiftly.

 

Yet, in a way, her ascendance to the throne at such a young age – she was just 25 in 1952, remember – was a harder cross to bear. She had no real family life, no freedom, no privacy, no room for an opinion, a slip, a hissy fit. When Charles vented his frustration at a leaky pen while signing the visitors’ book at Hillsborough Castle just days after his mother’s death – telling courtiers he ‘can’t bear this bloody thing’ – didn’t we all think: ‘Well, the Queen would never in a million years have done that!’ The Elizabethan age of ‘stiff upper lip’ and uncomplaining service and restraint finally ended in that moment.

 

King Charles and Queen Camilla on the balcony of Buckingham Palace following their coronation in May 2023

 

In contemplating the current situation with Harry, I believe the Queen would have advised King Charles to give Harry more time during his visit to Buckingham Palace upon learning of his father’s illness. She likely would have urged her son to show generosity, emphasizing that it was not a good look to be ungenerous. Additionally, I imagine she would have advised Prince William to approach Harry with care.

 

The Queen would have also been concerned about Charles’s recent stance toward Prince Andrew, particularly his push for Andrew to downsize from the Royal Lodge to the vacant Frogmore Cottage. After all, the Queen had made a point of ensuring Andrew was present at Prince Philip’s memorial, demonstrating her commitment to family over duty.

 

Unafraid of delivering hard truths, the Queen had offered advice to Liz Truss during what would be her final official duty, reminding her to pace herself—a poignant reflection given the current state of affairs. Watching her funeral now, it feels dissonant to hear the reading delivered by our shortest-serving prime minister and the dulcet tones of Huw Edwards, whose reputation has since suffered.

 

The contrast between our streets today and that crisp autumn day by the Thames, as we approached her coffin, is stark. The Queen would have been deeply saddened by recent tragedies, such as the murder of children in Southport, and her response would have been swift and compassionate. It’s a blessing that she has been spared witnessing the riots fueled by hatred, yet one can only imagine her feeling that her life’s work in building the Commonwealth was under threat. This resonates with a sentiment many families share: “I’m glad Mummy isn’t around to see this.”

 

The Princess of Wales announced that she has finished chemotherapy with a video that featured Prince William and their children

 

The Queen would be dismayed, perhaps, that her generation, the one that built this country, is seemingly being unfairly punished by a new Labour government, though she would, of course, have kept any political opinions to herself. That’s what I miss most: her ability to keep quiet when there is so much unsolicited, ill-informed noise.

 

But how proud she would be of William and Kate, watching their moving video announcing the Princess’s completion of chemotherapy. She would doubtless have rolled her eyes at the soft-focus, surely made in response to the tyranny of intimacy we all demand these days. But she would have seen herself in Kate – her uncomplaining, straight-backed, stoic lack of self-pity. And I am convinced the late Queen would be comforted that the family, currently so fractured, is in very safe hands.

Related Posts

Election forecaster who correctly called the 2020 result makes shock ‘blowout’ claim in Trump-Harris race

A data scientist who predicted the outcome of the 2020 presidential election has anticipated a landslide for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, in a blow to former president Donald Trump‘s hopes to reclaim…

Harry and Meghan’s decision to speak out about the Sus𝓈ℯ𝓍es’ US election has impressed ‘woke Hollywood elite’

Critics Claim Harry and Meghan’s Political Comments Are a Veiled Attempt to Influence US Elections     Harry and Meghan’s recent remarks on the US presidential election have…

Rafa Nadal Inspira en la Graduación de la Rafa Nadal Academy: “Quiero Ser Recordado como Buena Persona”

Rafa Nadal presidió la ceremonia de graduación de la Rafa Nadal Academy by Movistar en Manacor, su ciudad natal, acompañado de su entrenador Carlos Moyá y su esposa…

Taylor Swift Has Lost 5 Major Sponsors So Far After Her Big Endorsement.

In a dramatic twist that no one saw coming, pop icon Taylor Swift, known for her record-breaking albums and sold-out world tours, has reportedly lost five major sponsorship…

Donald Trump Makes History as the First Former President to Send a Bitcoin Transaction

In a groundbreaking moment for the cryptocurrency world, Donald Trump has reportedly become the first U.S. president to send a Bitcoin transaction. The event has sparked widespread discussion,…

Howard Stern says he ‘hates’ anyone that votes for Trump: ‘They are stupid, I have no respect for them’

Stern said he agrees with people comparing Trump to Nazi leader Adolf Hitler. SiriusXM radio host Howard Stern said Monday that he doesn’t “hate” former President Trump, but he hates…